Free Home Marketing

December 14, 2009

What’s your plan to save the US economy right now?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 7:22 pm
W.C. Felcher asked:


Here’s my plan:

1. No more free bailout money for anyone. Instead, US government gives banks vouchers to loan money to private businesses. The banks must loan the taxpayers’ money within 120 days to a credit worthy (independent rating) business or they lose the voucher. The bank must have a stake in the creditworthiness and debt repayment of the commercial borrower (perhaps by withholding percentage of earned commission over time). Essentially, the banks become accountable, commission-based middlemen for government loans.

2. Government demolishes vacant homes in ‘designated’ housing crisis cities such as Stockton, Tampa, Phoenix, and Las Vegas. The HUD secretary should convene a meeting of city mayors to come up with a plan to condemn vacant homes and blighted properties, and to ratchet up building code enforcement to remove questionable vacant homes from the market.

3. Cut capital gains tax to zero until December 31, 2010. That’s right. No one pays one cent of capital gains tax on any capital gains earned from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010. However, short swing transactions still pay ordinary income tax rate to discourage short selling and speculation. Thereafter, phase back tax increases until they return to current capital gains tax rate of fifteen percent.

In addition, after 2010, no capital gains tax break for foreign companies and foreign entities. If you want to gamble in the U.S stock market, you have to pay the vig to Uncle Sam starting in 2011.

4. Extend unemployment insurance benefits for six months.

5. Methodical and rational troop draw down in Iraq to save US taxpayers up to $10 billion dollars per month. Apply some of the saved money towards giant infrastructure and public works programs here in U.S.

6. Repeal the Bankruptcy Reform Act’s means test provisions. Allow Chapter 7 petitioners to discharge all debts owed to creditors, and not be forced into Chapter 13 reorganization plans.

7. Prohibit all foreign companies from bidding on government contracts until 2012.

Caffeinated Content for WordPress

October 2, 2009

How would you picture the country looking if we actually had a free market?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 2:12 am
O’Ryan asked:


It seems to me that everyone is so conditioned to actually believe that we need government involved with absolutely everything. Let’s say that we actually had a free market with limited taxation and looser labour laws. I know it’s easy to say that you would only be paid a penny an hour but keep in mind that more people would be able to afford to operate businesses without ridiculous taxes and being required to purchase insane insurance policies and it is very possible that we would make more money working for others as the job market would be competitive, although there would inevitably way less government jobs.

This is a hypothetical. Please paint the best picture that you can of a United States with a free market. Easy ten points since everyone has done their home work on what our country would look like under their ideal economic system.
And no…I don’t really expect anyone saying that the place would look like crap because there would be way too much corruption as we haven’t had a free market in a very long time and we still haven’t been exempt from corruption and you could never convince me that there isn’t such a thing in China, Cuba or anywhere in Europe.
Where did I say anything about anarchism? I don’t recollect saying that. I didn’t say that.

And a free market got us into this mess that we are in now? Interesting, especially being that in this free market that you speak of, the banks were given tax dollars to bail them out. Very fascinating! Also, Mr. American Socialist, how odd it is that Europe is in an Economic crisis as well. I guess that Cuba is alright, where you are lucky to pull in $90 USD in a month, no matter what you do.

Caffeinated-content.com

September 18, 2009

How can people blame the free market instead of the government’s easy credit policies for the Crash of ‘08?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 11:13 am
Brad asked:


The government adopted easy credit policies over a number of years to help people who are unqualified to get mortgages. The Community Reinvestment Act is one notorious example. This act required affirmative action (that is, reverse discrimination) in lending because large numbers of minorities were incapable of affording a home. The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) had their activists trespass on bank property, obstructing bank customers until the banks agreed to loan money to people who were unqualified. Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac lowered their standards, encouraging banks to give out unsound loans (many Republicans proposed regulating Fannie and Freddy to stop this, but Democrats and some other Republicans stopped them from doing so). Most importantly, Alan Greenspan at the Federal Reserve decided to lower interest rates to absurd levels (largely for short-term political gain as President Bush needed the illusion of economic recovery in order to deflect attacks from Democrats over his economic management and Alan Greenspan, of course, is a good Republican who wanted to help out his party).

George W. Bush and the Republicans also deserve portions of the blame. Bush’s American Dream Downpayment Act was part of a trend toward the elimination of downpayments as a safeguard against unqualified people being given mortgages. The bankruptcy reforms of the Bush years also played a role, as creditors were more willing to loan, since they knew that it would be nearly impossible for the debtors not to repay them. As a result, insanity ensued, as a bank issued a credit card to a tree (see: http://www.snopes.com/business/bank/treecard.asp ).

Considering that the evidence clearly shows that the government is responsible for what has happened to our economy, why are many people blaming the free market? Isn’t it time to face the evidence and admit that easy credit brought on by idiotic government policies was the root cause?

Caffeinated-content.com

April 18, 2009

What would have been the better political option?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 2:11 am
Panarion asked:


Pay out all american citizens loans of which there is only 305 million people and let the market perform its natural function and destroy the weak businesses and banks or payout the banks to save the greedy shareholders and incompetent managers and CEOS .

Imagine a deby free society who all owned their own homes against a few greedy parasites who get a golden handshake or dividend to celebrate their incompetence, greed and political affiliation.

How can a free market be able to pay huge divedends to greedy shareholders and then bail them out when times get tough.

The shareholders who take the profits should always be prepared to take the pain…not the working stiffs and their family in the street.

That is not a free market.! …It is corruption !!

Create a video blog…instantly.

November 7, 2008

How is health care a free market ?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 3:07 am
SP asked:


O.K. Just imagine there is only one grocery store in town (bigger cities may have a couple more). You go to the store to get the groceries you need but don’t know the price of any items you get before you take them home. after you use the groceries the store sends you the bill. WHO IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD DO BUSINESS THIS WAY ? Oh yea, that is the way a hospital does business.
No, they did not have a price list. They said they would have to get back to me on a particular price I was inquireing about.
Yes, Hubris. many families would either starve or go bankrupt.
I wold have to work aprox. 100 hours at a minimium wage job just to pay for a blood test. How fair is that? contest it? Really ?!?

Create a video blog

September 27, 2008

They said we had to do this to get the economy going again right? That was the point of this governmental?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 4:47 pm
bladesinger0712 asked:


They said we had to do this to get the economy going again right? That was the point of this governmental effort right?

Fix the Housing/Lending market so small business can continue to grow and hire. Buy up bad mortgages so banks can lend again and free up some credit and lending to Business and individuals so they can go buy the car they want or invest in a home or business.

They say give them an inch they will take a mile, is it fair to say that is what is happening here?

Spend 400 Billion (previous admin), Spend 800 Billion on stuff that has nothing to do with the above, 800 Billon without getting credit flowing as was the intent of the “Bailout” which became a “Stimulus Package” which is now a “Recovery” Bill. Rhetoric. Then come back to us and say we need another 400 Billion. Through out it all Obama says

No, earmarks, No pork, no lobbyist, Cut spending, spend responsibly; do not spend what you do not have.

Fiscal irresponsibility summit, Cut the deficit, End Debt

Then President Obama put a $4 trillion price tag on new budget
a whopping $1.75 trillion more than the President expects the government to raise in revenue, creating the largest federal deficit in real dollars since the country was fighting World War II.

among other things the Budget Bill that the house passed yesterday contains about 8,500 pet projects totaling nearly $8 billion.

Democrats, have a chance to seriously upstage the GOP and show liberal genius, but instead are insisting on not opposing bad ideas. Instead embarrassing yourselves by blaming Bush, why?

The spending Obama and the left is doing is their choice now, this spending is on Obama, and he has far surpassed Bush with his reckless spending.

Bush’s Fault? For the people by the people, what about congress? Who has had the majority when the Bailout was drafted and passed?

and who has it even still now?

Caffeinated Content

July 23, 2008

Thank God for the free market system unbridled Capitalism?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 10:47 am
ervin_parker asked:


Are you ashamed this could happen in America? Kinda makes you want to say thank-you Conservatives for both unbridled Capitalism and your vision of what America could be if only the wealthy/business interests ran the USA.!

Tent city in suburbs is cost of home crisis
By Dana Ford Fri Dec 21, 8:18 AM ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071221/lf_nm/usa_housing_social_dc

Between railroad tracks and beneath the roar of departing planes sits tent city, a terminus for homeless people. It is not, as might be expected, in a blighted city center, but in the once-booming suburbia of Southern California.

As more families throw in the towel and head to foreclosure here and across the nation, the social costs of collapse are adding up in the form of higher rates of homelessness, crime and even disease.

While no current residents claim to be victims of foreclosure, all agree that tent city is a symptom of the wider economic downturn. And it’s just a matter of time before foreclosed famil
Happy Holidays a great big thank-you to the religious Conservatives for making this a wonderful Christmas for so many!

Website content

July 10, 2008

How do you like the Democrats economy?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 3:36 am
Jack asked:


We all know Democratic deregulation is creating fake bubbles throughout multiple sectors of our economy.

We also know that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac created the housing bubble and subsequent collapse. Then the banks fell.

Those same programs are still in place and the Democrats are blowing trillions on propping it up again.

Businesses are not recovering. They have seen no improvement.

Unemployment went up and will continue to go up even with the $100,000/temporary government jobs Barry is doling out.

So the Democrats have put your home underwater, doling out money to those who are irresponsible, and expanding their artificial bubbles of the free market, all while blowing trillions of dollars.

What is your perspective over the next 2-3 years?

Caffeinated Content for WordPress

June 24, 2008

Do you support my bill to regulate capitalism?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 4:49 am
Wepwesentative Bawney Fwank (D) asked:


In order to anything in the free market, you have to fill out 17 forms and file them to the appropriate agencies (including the Labor, Commerce and Treasury Departments) and wait 6-8 months for approval before we allow you to do anything including:
opening up a business, hiring workers, purchasing private health insurance, buying or selling stocks/derivative contracts, selling your house or buying a new home, taking more than $100 offshore, opening up a factory, purchasing capital equipment, exchanging currency and so forth.

I’m planning to regulate capitalism out of existence!

Create a video blog

April 8, 2008

Why does free market capitalism get a bad rep?

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — admin @ 6:49 am
Obama: Why So Socialist asked:


The bail outs are not free market capitalism, that’s fascism to have the government dictate the market.

Don’t tell me it divides the rich and the poor. 50% of the American GDP is from small businesses – Fortune Magazine

Not to mention majority of America is middle class, there are more suburbs then any other form of society in America. Middle class to me sounds balanced, there isn’t a majority of lower or upper class, only a select few in population.

In free market capitalism the consumers dictate what they want to buy, the businesses can’t survive unless they satisfy what the consumer wants to purchase.

With the bail outs the government chose to do ruined the free market, the consumers dictated they don’t want cars from GM, the government intervened and bailed them out. In a free market capitalist system, that company would go out of business, and a more efficient business would move in that territory and do a better job. Bailing out GM will come back to haunt us if it fails again, it will mandate another bail out or bankruptcy.

The banks them selves aren’t truly a free market. They are mandated by the government with so many regulations they lose their freedom to choose what to do. The Community Reinvestment Act which Fannie Mae in 1992 was invested in crashed later at the end of the Bush Term in 2008. That’s 18 years difference in time. Home Mortgage loans take time to pay off. If you give loans to people that have bad credit obviously they’re a hazard to possibly repay it back. Banks where mandated by the government to give out the loans to people that didn’t qualify. Not discrediting banks being greedy they where, but it was the bureaucracy that enabled banks to have bad practice.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act – Read the History

The regulations banks under went with all the changes and enabling them to give bad loans is the reason we feel this 18 years later. Most peoples home loans take longer then 18 years to pay off. Giving them to people that didn’t qualify makes it even more dangerous, with the housing market devalued the banks got the homes back with a lower value of the origional loan, cooping an even bigger loss since they can’t sell it back.

It’s not free market capitalism to bail out the banks, and it wasn’t free market capitalism for the government to regulate banks on how they distribute home loans. The government made the mess, and it’s the tax payer that suffers. This isn’t free market capitalism. I just want to make sure you realize free market capitalism doesn’t involve government regulation/interference.

If you mention things like the FDA and FCC, those don’t dictate what company’s can sell their product at or anything, that’s for safety purposes, it will effect a company’s cost but they will just push it to the consumer, regulating the cost they put to the consumer will damage their ability to independently function in the free market.

So don’t bash a system you probably know nothing about. It really upsets me people watch Michael Moore’s movie and think that’s capitalism. Bail outs are not Free Market Capitalism, it’s government interference which is fascism.
Sakata Gintoki: Wow you’re pretty ignorant, the people in other countries wouldn’t have jobs in their country if it wasn’t for the US providing them. They would be killing each other and be unproductive. In any state where there is no employment, which can be a country like Somalia or even the great depression. It was and always will be out of order since there is no production, everyone will just kill each other and constantly be at war. There is no wealth generated. When employment happens, production increases causing wealth to be generated, and it’s peaceful. Government housing projects have the highest crime rates in America for a reason that is parallel to unemployment.
crunch: Free Market Capitalism hasn’t existed since FDR, his socialistic ideals make Americans dependent on the government. The more dependent on the government one becomes the less independent they become. Causing them to demand the government takes care of them. This is why we have health care reform, Medicare is costing America too much money each year, Obama is going to end Medicare and merge it with his new plan. It’s going to keep adding to our debt. I’d rather disable all government aid. Not allow doctors to be sued by Lawyers. Then sit back and watch the Doctors compete against each other for patients. There would be so much competition doctors would force each other to lower prices. Just like fast food when McDonalds introduced the dollar menu. Everyone else had to have a value menu because they where getting killed. The consumer will always win.
Sakata Gintoki: Wow you’re a whiny little blamer, do you understand everyone has the free will to choose what to do with their lives? You can’t blame the employer when the employee willingly works there. You can’t blame tobacco companies for people who smoke and get cancer since the individual should of known better. You’re discrediting the individuals right to choose what they want to do. You blame others for the individuals fault and sole choice they made on their own. You can’t blame someone when the individual chose to do it. No one is forcing anyone to work any where, unless it was a totalitarian state and mandates they must. That isn’t the case in Free Market Capitalism. The Employees can picket and not work there, if they picket and they get fired and replaced by others, it obviously tells everyone that the work environment must not be that bad if others still want to work there.
Matthew D: Middle Class is not defined by how much money you have, since the cost of living per state is different. Middle Class homes in So Cal cost 500k, if you took 500k to Alabama you could live in a mansion. The upper class homes here are valued from 900k and up in So Cal. You can’t live in a big house here. It depends on where you live and what the cost of living is. All suburbs are defined as middle class. Government housing projects are lower class, and the upper class are the few rich that live in areas the average person can’t afford. Most homes in America are affordable for the average American depending on which state you are in. Real Estate is about location, saying a value determines middle class is stupid, because 500k in so cal isn’t worth much compared to Alabama. It’s about each location and what the norm is.
AgriCult: I know who George Orwell is, he is an author of a book 1984 which was a prediction of how totalitarianism would spread. I know what his philosophy is. Second I want to say that Hitler was a Fascist, Fascism is two things.

1. The cause of race superiority.
2. The merge of corporations and government

I for one see number 2 clearly happening right now in our American society. 61% of GM is owned by the US Department of Treasury. It’s damaging the system America was built upon. The fore fathers wanted a small government, we are constantly stirring away from it, and I don’t want to have a government that is parallel to the king of England. If the government today owns many companies and the king of England taxed high percentages, what difference does it make. Either way the form of government generates a high revenue through ownership or taxation. I really dislike this, all governments can do is go bankrupt, we see it with the USSR, Nazi Germany, and with us being 11 trill debt.
remmycool: due to lack of comenting space I am allowed I will keep this short. I agree with everything you said, if the world was a free market system America’s value would decrease. I don’t mind that, I am not about superiority of currency, I am for the innovation free market capitalism has offered the world. I love it and it makes every bureaucrat look like a selfish dictator that wants the wealth through taxation.

I agree with your comparison of Zimbabwe and them being millionaires. Of course not everyone can be a millionaire, it would just be inflation and the value would be even more useless. The problem is people see the rich and think that they’re selfish. The belief of that is preposterous since the rich generated that wealth through smart investments. Every society there is a rich class, either a dictatorship/government or the people who choose to make innovative ideas in our democratic republic society. I hate the witch hunts people have on successful people.
Aidan: Well for starters I agree with you that the bail outs saved capitalism since it enables banks to give loans to businesses for what ever purpose they need it for. How ever I disagree that you will believe a government report on a government program they allowed. I see a bias there considering if they disagree with their own intended policy it will make them lose credibility, Americans will lose trust in them and no one would ever want something like this to happen again. To push this point even further look at the cause and effects of other programs.

Social Security’s cause is to allow you to be financially secure by the government past age 65, yet people past 65 still work and aren’t retired.

Welfare sounds nice to help people in poverty, yet those people become dependent on the program and always will be in poverty. There is no incentive to become independent and not depend on the government anymore.

I can go on and on, but I hope you get the point, plus I have no more space
x x: You do realize oil companies face a major restriction by the government of where they can drill. If oil companies could drill any where and have a massive quantity the price of it would lower. Gas would be much cheaper if it was accessable by oil companies to drill any where. The government restricts oil companies to drill any where. So oil companies must buy it from foreign distributors like Canada, and the tariff they pay to ship it here adds to the cost of production. Due to scarcity and the tariff cost, the oil companies pass these burdens to the consumers. Otherwise they would eat a massive loss and go out of business. Again that’s government regulation ruining the free market ability of oil companies drilling where ever they want. Gold is expensive because of the scarcity it holds as a natural resource. Same reason why you won’t pay money for dirt since it is every where it’s so common it doesn’t hold a value.

Create a video blog…instantly.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress