They said we had to do this to get the economy going again right? That was the point of this governmental effort right?
Fix the Housing/Lending market so small business can continue to grow and hire. Buy up bad mortgages so banks can lend again and free up some credit and lending to Business and individuals so they can go buy the car they want or invest in a home or business.
They say give them an inch they will take a mile, is it fair to say that is what is happening here?
Spend 400 Billion (previous admin), Spend 800 Billion on stuff that has nothing to do with the above, 800 Billon without getting credit flowing as was the intent of the “Bailout” which became a “Stimulus Package” which is now a “Recovery” Bill. Rhetoric. Then come back to us and say we need another 400 Billion. Through out it all Obama says
No, earmarks, No pork, no lobbyist, Cut spending, spend responsibly; do not spend what you do not have.
Fiscal irresponsibility summit, Cut the deficit, End Debt
Then President Obama put a $4 trillion price tag on new budget
a whopping $1.75 trillion more than the President expects the government to raise in revenue, creating the largest federal deficit in real dollars since the country was fighting World War II.
among other things the Budget Bill that the house passed yesterday contains about 8,500 pet projects totaling nearly $8 billion.
Democrats, have a chance to seriously upstage the GOP and show liberal genius, but instead are insisting on not opposing bad ideas. Instead embarrassing yourselves by blaming Bush, why?
The spending Obama and the left is doing is their choice now, this spending is on Obama, and he has far surpassed Bush with his reckless spending.
Bush’s Fault? For the people by the people, what about congress? Who has had the majority when the Bailout was drafted and passed?
and who has it even still now?
Caffeinated Content
